In re Carlos M
Filed 5/15/06 In re Carlos M. CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
In re CARLOS M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B183837 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. FJ36289) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARLOS M., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Shep Zebberman, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Marta I. Stanton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels and Thomas C. Hsieh, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
___________________________________
Appellant, Carlos M., appeals from an order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court after finding appellant committed acts in violation of Penal Code section 211 (second degree robbery, two counts) and Penal Code sections 664 and 211 (attempted second degree robbery). The juvenile court ordered appellant suitably placed and fixed the maximum period of confinement at six years and eight months. Appellant contends the following standard conditions of probation ordered by the juvenile court, without objection, are unconstitutionally vague or overbroad because they lack the element of knowledge by appellant: â€
