legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Bettencourt

In re Bettencourt
10:25:2007















In re Bettencourt























Filed 10/19/07 In re Bettencourt CA6















NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.









IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT









In re DANIEL FREDRICK BETTENCOURT,





on Habeas Corpus.





H030822





(Santa ClaraCounty



Super. Ct. No. 79903)





ORDER MODIFYING OPINION





[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT





THE COURT:



It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 3, 2007, be modified in the following particulars:



On page 24, the last sentence of the third full paragraph, the name Dabney is changed to Bettencourt so that the sentence reads:





These facts constitute a modicum of evidence in support of the Boards finding that Bettencourt has an unstable social history.





This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.





______________________________________



BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, ACTING P.J.





______________________________________



MIHARA, J.





______________________________________



MCADAMS, J.





















Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.



Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line Lawyers.









Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale