In re Bettencourt
Filed 10/19/07 In re Bettencourt CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
In re DANIEL FREDRICK BETTENCOURT, on Habeas Corpus. | H030822 (Santa ClaraCounty Super. Ct. No. 79903) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 3, 2007, be modified in the following particulars:
On page 24, the last sentence of the third full paragraph, the name Dabney is changed to Bettencourt so that the sentence reads:
These facts constitute a modicum of evidence in support of the Boards finding that Bettencourt has an unstable social history.
This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.
______________________________________
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, ACTING P.J.
______________________________________
MIHARA, J.
______________________________________
MCADAMS, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line Lawyers.


