legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ashleigh B.

In re Ashleigh B.
09:04:2008



In re Ashleigh B.



Filed 9/3/08 In re Ashleigh B. CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(El Dorado)



----



In re ASHLEIGH B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



EL DORADO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



ALEXANDER B.,



Defendant and Appellant.



C058402



(Super. Ct. No. SDP20080006)



Appellant Alexander B. (father), father of Ashleigh B. (the minor), appeals from an order adjudging the minor a dependent child and continuing removal from appellants custody despite return of the minor to the home under the mothers custody and care. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 360, 361, 395.)



Appellant contends (1) the dispositional order removing



the minor from appellants custody exceeds the juvenile courts jurisdiction; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support



the courts exercise of jurisdiction over the minor; and



(3) the requirement that appellant undergo drug testing was unreasonable.



We take judicial notice of the juvenile courts findings and orders of August 6, 2008 (Evid. Code, 452, subd. (d), 459), which reflect that the juvenile court subsequently terminated supervision, terminated dependency jurisdiction and dismissed the petition in this matter, rendering the issues raised on appeal moot. (See People v. Herrera (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 1191, 1198 [[a]n action that originally was based on a justiciable controversy cannot be maintained on appeal if all the questions have become moot by subsequent acts or events. A reversal in such a case would be without practical effect, and the appeal will therefore be dismissed]; see also In re Robert A. (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 174, 182.)



DISPOSITION



The appeal is dismissed.



HULL , J.



We concur:



DAVIS , Acting P.J.



NICHOLSON , J.



Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.



Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description Appellant Alexander B. (father), father of Ashleigh B. (the minor), appeals from an order adjudging the minor a dependent child and continuing removal from appellants custody despite return of the minor to the home under the mothers custody and care. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 360, 361, 395.) The appeal is dismissed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale