In re Alexander L.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed 5/30/13  In re Alexander L. CA1/5

 

 

 

 

 

>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

 

 

California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b).  This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.

 

 

IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION
FIVE

 

 

 
>

In re ALEXANDER L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. ___________________________________ THE PEOPLE,      Plaintiff and Respondent,      v. ALEXANDER L.,      Defendant and Appellant.

A135213               (Contra Costa County Super. Ct.             No. J0602298)               ORDER MODIFYING OPINION             [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

 

BY THE COURT:

 

            It
is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 1, 2013, be modified
as follows:

 

1.      The
first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 9 is revised to read as
follows:  “ Reversal of the order from
which this appeal is taken will certainly grant appellant effectual relief,
because it will reverse the commitment imposed by the April 9, 2012 dispositional order.”

 

2.      The
final sentence of the carryover paragraph at the top of page 10, beginning with
the word “Accordingly,” is revised by deleting all text after the word “order,”
while retaining footnote 8.  The revised
sentence reads as follows: “Accordingly, we will reverse the April 9, 2012 dispositional order.⁸”


 

3.      Footnote
9 on page 11 is revised by adding the following sentence to the end of the
footnote:  “Because the February 15, 2013 dispositional order
is not before us, we express no view on it.”

 

4.      On
page 12, the language following the heading “DISPOSITION” is deleted and
replaced with the following:  “The April
9, 2012 dispositional order is reversed and the matter is remanded so that the
juvenile court may address the issues discussed in part IV of this opinion and
for such further proceedings as are authorized by law.”

 

            There
is no change in judgment.

 

            Nothing
in this order should be construed as expressing any view on the various legal
arguments the parties have raised in their findings related to the request for
modification.

 

 

 

 

 

Dated:  _______________                         __________________________________, P. J.>