Houtkin v. Sharp Healthcare




Filed 1/7/11 Houtkin v. Sharp Healthcare CA4/1




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.




COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SHERRY HOUTKIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. SHARP HEALTHCARE, Defendant and Respondent; FREE SACRED TRINITY CHURCH et al., Objectors and Appellants.	D055754, D056738 (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00066427) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 15, 2010, be modified as follows:
On page 2, first paragraph, first full sentence, DELETE the word "spa" and REPLACE it with "spiritual and healing mission" so that the sentence reads: "Sharp subpoenaed records from the Optimum Health Institute (OHI), a non-party, after learning that Houtkin had spent two or three weeks at its Lemon Grove spiritual and healing mission immediately before his emergency surgery."
The court meant no disrespect to Free Sacred Trinity Church or its mission in describing the Optimum Health Institute as a "spa."
There is no change in the judgment.
Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied.


McINTYRE, Acting P. J.


Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line Lawyers.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com



Copies to: All parties