Hawkins v. Merill Lynch
Filed 11/20/07 Hawkins v. Merill Lynch CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
TAKAKO HAWKINS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B190196 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC279691) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the majority opinion filed herein on October 25, 2007, be modified as follows.
1. On page 30, paragraph 2, line 3, the words conversion (tenth) are deleted so the sentence reads:
Upon issuance of the remittitur, the orders sustaining the demurrers to the causes
of action of fiduciary duty breach (sixth and seventh), constructive fraud (eighth),
and negligence (eleventh) are to be set aside.
There is no change in judgment.
________________________________ TURNER, P. J. | _________________________________ KRIEGLER, J. |
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
