legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Espinoza v. County of Orange

Espinoza v. County of Orange
03:25:2012

Espinoza v





Espinoza v. County of Orange






Filed 3/12/12 Espinoza v. County of Orange CA4/3






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE



RALPH ESPINOZA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF ORANGE,

Defendant and Appellant.



G043067 (consol. with G043345)

(Super. Ct. No. 30-2008-00110643)

ORDER MODIFYNG OPINION
AND DENYING PETITION FOR
REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN
JUDGMENT


It is ordered that the opinion filed on February 9, 2012 be modified as follows:
On page 20, in the last paragraph, delete the fourth sentence and replace it with the following: “Further, despite plaintiff and another employee telling several management personnel of potential violators, management interviewed none of the potential violators, including the individual defendants.”


This modification does not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.





RYLAARSDAM, J.

WE CONCUR:



O’LEARY, P. J.



IKOLA, J.




Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale