Cardone v. SCIE
Filed 6/22/06 Cardone v. SCIE CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| STEVE CARDONE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SCIE LLC et al., Defendants and Appellants. | B187261 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC334684) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Paul Gutman, Judge. Affirmed.
Ben-Zvi & Associates and Henry Ben-Zvi for Defendants and Appellants.
Law Offices of David Z. Ribakoff and David Z. Ribakoff for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_____________________________
The trial court granted a special motion to dismiss under the anti-SLAPP statute, then granted the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and denied the special motion to dismiss. The defendants appeal, challenging both the reconsideration order and the order denying the special motion to dismiss. We affirm.
FACTS
A.
About six years ago, Devil Productions LLC, an independent film production company, began a remake of â€
