legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Brooks v. San Francisco Chronicle

Brooks v. San Francisco Chronicle
10:04:2010



Brooks v














Brooks v. San Francisco Chronicle













Filed 9/16/10 Brooks v. San Francisco Chronicle CA1/4

>

>

>

>

>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

>

California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.





IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION
FOUR




>






DESLEY
BROOKS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SAN
FRANCISCO CHRONICLE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.






A125046



(Alameda
County

Super. Ct.
No. RG08-400868)






I.

INTRODUCTION

Oakland
City Councilmember Desley Brooks (Brooks) sued the San
Francisco Chronicle (the Chronicle) and a Chronicle reporter, Chip Johnson,
for defamation in relation to a column Johnson wrote, and the Chronicle
published, entitled â€




Description Oakland City Councilmember Desley Brooks (Brooks) sued the San Francisco Chronicle (the Chronicle) and a Chronicle reporter, Chip Johnson, for defamation in relation to a column Johnson wrote, and the Chronicle published, entitled â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale