Bendah v. Rong
Filed 5/30/06 Bendah v. Rong CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
MORRIS BENDAH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LI SHU RONG et al., Defendants and Appellants. | A110481 (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. HG-03-099067) |
I.
INTRODUCTION
This is an appeal from an order of the Alameda County Superior Court granting in part respondent's motions to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the so-called anti-SLAPP statute (hereafter SLAPP motions).[1] Appellants' appeal does not address the merits of the claims made in respondent's SLAPP motions, nor do they claim that the court erred in adjudicating these arguments. Appellants argue only that the court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motions because of appellants' failure to comply with former section 425.16, subdivision (f) (hereafter section 425(f)), requiring the hearing date to be set â€
