legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Dan C. v. Superior Court
In October 2006 this court issued its opinion (1) directing the Humboldt County Juvenile Court to vacate its July 2006 order terminating the reunification period and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 366.26 hearing for Michael H. and (2) remanding the matter to the juvenile court for the limited purpose of determining whether conditions for permitting a bypass of reunification services existed at the time of the hearing. (Dan C. v. Superior Court (Oct. 16, 2006, A114694 [nonpub. opn.] (Dan C. I).) Following the hearing on remand, the court determined that a bypass of reunification services was warranted and set a contested hearing under section 366.26 for May 7, 2007. Petitioner Dan C. has again filed a petition challenging the order on remand. Court deny the petition on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale