Zachary S. v. Superior Court CA5
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Annette Rees, Judge.
Jill Smith for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Thomas E. Boze, County Counsel, and Maria Elena Ratliff, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.
-ooOoo-
Petitioner Zachary S. (father), through counsel, seeks an extraordinary writ (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) from the juvenile court’s orders issued at a contested 18 month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22) on May 6, 2022, terminating reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing on September 6, 2022, as to the children, Z.S, M.S., and I.S. The petition contends the juvenile court erred by finding that return of the children to father’s care would create a substantial risk of detriment and that the Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (agency) provided reasonable services. Father also argues that the juvenile court erred in failing to continue father’s reunification services to the 24-month revi
Comments on Zachary S. v. Superior Court CA5