In re Albert T.
Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, Albert T., already a delinquent ward based on earlier offenses (Welf. and Inst. Code, S 602; all further undesignated section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code), admitted committing second degree commercial burglary. The court placed him on home probation with certain conditions. Later, after a contested hearing pursuant to section 777 based on allegations of various probation violations, the court imposed a more restrictive placement despite finding "that there's [no] demonstrated violation of probation."
Albert appeals, contending that the court erred in imposing a more restrictive placement despite finding no probation violation. We agree, reverse the order imposing a more restrictive placement, and in all other respects affirm the judgment (order continuing wardship).
Comments on In re Albert T.