legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Rakower v. Singh
An attorney, appeals a judgment against him for malicious prosecution filed by Dr. Stephen R. Rakower. Attorney contends the trial court erred by denying his anti-SLAPP motion, overruling his demurrer, and failing to redact portions of attorney correspondence admitted into evidence. First, court discern no abuse of discretion in denial of Attorney's untimely motion to strike. (See Code Civ. Proc., S 425.16; further statutory references are to this code unless noted otherwise.) Second, Attorney's demurrer presented questions of fact, and therefore the trial court properly overruled it. Finally, court conclude the unredacted letters presented little or no prejudice because they contained relevant evidence and, in any event, the trial court prevented any possible prejudice with a limiting instruction. Court therefore affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale