Rakower v. Singh
An attorney, appeals a judgment against him for malicious prosecution filed by Dr. Stephen R. Rakower. Attorney contends the trial court erred by denying his anti-SLAPP motion, overruling his demurrer, and failing to redact portions of attorney correspondence admitted into evidence. First, court discern no abuse of discretion in denial of Attorney's untimely motion to strike. (See Code Civ. Proc., S 425.16; further statutory references are to this code unless noted otherwise.) Second, Attorney's demurrer presented questions of fact, and therefore the trial court properly overruled it. Finally, court conclude the unredacted letters presented little or no prejudice because they contained relevant evidence and, in any event, the trial court prevented any possible prejudice with a limiting instruction. Court therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on Rakower v. Singh