legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Katz v. Jeppe
This case involves a land use dispute between two neighbors. Plaintiffs claim a prescriptive easement over adjacent land owned by defendant Arthur Jeppe, Jr., for the limited purpose of maintaining and repairing their narrow side yard and the side of their home.
Court find that permissive use allowed by Jeppe and the prior owners of the property of the two foot wide strip of land on the side of Jeppe's house, based upon tacit consent or neighborly accommodation, is insufficient to establish a prescriptive title to a right of way over Jeppe's property. Thus, the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Jeppe on the Katzes' cause of action to quiet title to a prescriptive easement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale