legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Nunez CA5
Defendant Victor Nunez (defendant) shot and killed an individual shortly after the individual had an altercation with a fellow member of defendant’s gang, codefendant Fernando Rojas. He was convicted of several crimes in connection with the incident, including first degree murder with the gang-murder special circumstance.
The Attorney General concedes that, as a result of the passage of Assembly Bill No. 333 (2021–2022 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill 333), defendant’s conviction for active gang participation and his gang enhancement must be reversed. We accept that concession.
We further conclude the court erred in denying defendant’s Pitchess motion as to several law enforcement officers who testified at trial. We will conditionally reverse pursuant to the procedure outlined in People v. Hustead (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 410, 418–419.
Defendant’s eventual resentencing moots his challenge to a parole revocation fine imposed by the court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale