legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brycsak CA2/4
Appellant Anthony Brycsak pled no contest to committing a lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. He contends the court erred in imposing fines and fees without first considering his ability to pay. Alternatively, he contends the sex offender fine imposed under Penal Code section 290.3 should have been $300, not $400.
Appellant forfeited the former contention by failing to object to imposition of fines and fees at trial. However, we agree with appellant and respondent Attorney General that the sex offender fine exceeded the statutorily prescribed amount and must be reduced to $300. We modify the judgment to strike the $400 fine and reflect imposition of a $300 fine pursuant to section 290.3. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale