legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Y.M. CA4/2
The juvenile court found true allegations that Y.M. et al. (the children) were at substantial risk of serious physical harm due to defendant and appellant, V.B. (mother’s), inability to protect the children. The court granted mother reunification services.
On appeal, mother contends insufficient evidence supports the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings with respect to her. San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (the department) maintains mother’s challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings are nonjusticiable because: (1) she both failed to object to and agreed to the court’s dispositional order; and (2) the juvenile court’s findings as to the fathers would be sufficient for the court to take jurisdiction over the children regardless. We issued a tentative opinion in which we agreed with mother and proposed to reverse the jurisdictional findings against her.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale