legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ros
A jury convicted appellant of attempted murder (Pen. Code,SS 187, subd. (a), 664; count 1), discharging a firearm in a grossly negligent manner (S 243; count 2), and assault with a firearm (S 245, subd. (a)(2); count 3). The jury found true allegations that (1) in committing each offense appellant acted for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (S 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(A)); (2) in committing the count 1offense, he personally used a firearm within the meaning of section 12022.53,subdivision (b); and (3) in committing the count 3 offense, he personally useda firearm within the meaning of section 12022.5, subdivision (a)(1).
The court imposed a prison term of 27 years,consisting of the seven year midterm on count 1 and ten years on the gang and firearm use enhancements accompanying that count. The court imposed concurrent terms on the remaining counts and enhancements.
On appeal, appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his attempted murder conviction. Specifically,appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to one element of the offense: the specific intent to kill the victim. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale