Ortega v. Higgs Fletcher and Mack CA4/1
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kenneth J. Medel, Judge. Affirmed.
Shakina Ortega, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin, Douglas A. Pettit, Jocelyn D. Hannah and Sabrina D. Johnson for Defendants and Respondents.
Plaintiff Shakina Ortega (Plaintiff) appeals from a judgment in favor of her former attorneys, defendants Higgs Fletcher and Mack LLP (HFM), Paul J. Pfingst, and Christina Denning (together, Defendants), following the grant of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Plaintiff raises a number of issues and arguments based on her contention that the trial court erred by deciding the summary judgment motion at a time in the litigation when Pfingst owed discovery responses and a discovery dispute was pending. As we explain, Plaintiff did not meet her burden of establishing reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Ortega v. Higgs Fletcher and Mack CA4/1