P. v. Stallworth CA3
Lavelle Stallworth challenges his commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) He argues the trial court erred in admitting some exhibits and failing to redact others. He also argues his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to object to evidence contained in the exhibits. We conclude that only one of Stallworth’s many claims of error has merit, but the error was harmless. Accordingly, we will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Stallworth CA3