legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Stallworth CA3
Lavelle Stallworth challenges his commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) He argues the trial court erred in admitting some exhibits and failing to redact others. He also argues his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to object to evidence contained in the exhibits. We conclude that only one of Stallworth’s many claims of error has merit, but the error was harmless. Accordingly, we will affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale