P. v. Harness CA4/15
Defendant Richard Harness challenges his commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP). He argues the trial court erred when it admitted case-specific hearsay in two exhibits (exhibits 4 & 5) and expert testimony based on those documents, in violation of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez). We will affirm the judgment.

Comments on P. v. Harness CA4/15

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced