legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Jaime CA2/11
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Mark Jaime of four sex offenses for molesting his daughter over a period of several years. The trial court sentenced him to 38 years to life in state prison. On appeal, Jaime raises three arguments: (1) statements he made during a police interview were inadmissible because he was in custody and not given Miranda warnings; (2) the statements were inadmissible because they were involuntary; and (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by giving a modified version of the flight instruction. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale