P. v. Jaime CA2/11
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Mark Jaime of four sex offenses for molesting his daughter over a period of several years. The trial court sentenced him to 38 years to life in state prison. On appeal, Jaime raises three arguments: (1) statements he made during a police interview were inadmissible because he was in custody and not given Miranda warnings; (2) the statements were inadmissible because they were involuntary; and (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by giving a modified version of the flight instruction. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Jaime CA2/11