legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Delgado CA2/3
Froylan Delgado appeals from a judgment entered after the jury convicted him of shooting at an occupied vehicle, assault with an assault weapon, and possession of a firearm. The jury also found true gang and firearm enhancement allegations. On appeal, Delgado contends his due process rights were violated because the trial court instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 315 that an eyewitness’s level of certainty can be considered when evaluating the reliability of the witness’s identification. Delgado also argues the trial court abused its discretion by declining to exercise its discretion to strike the firearm enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (c), and defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to present any argument on Delgado’s behalf at the sentencing hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale