P. v. Fitz CA2/3
Appellant Ricardo Padilla Fitz appeals from an order denying his postjudgment motion which had asked the trial court to “grant a remand” so “the court can exercise its newly-granted discretion” to strike or dismiss a firearm enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (h), as amended by Senate Bill No. 620 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.). Fitz’s appellate counsel filed a brief under People v. Serrano (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 496 (Serrano) and People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Fitz filed a supplemental brief. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that Fitz has appealed a nonappealable order and thus dismiss this appeal.
Comments on P. v. Fitz CA2/3