Rex v. Pelegrin CA2/3
Plaintiff Anne Rex sued defendant Laura Ann Pelegrin, asserting contract and malicious prosecution claims stemming from economic disputes that arose after the parties ended their romantic relationship. The claims were tried to the court, which rendered a judgment in favor of Pelegrin under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8. Rex appeals the judgment. She argues the trial court erroneously excluded a witness’s testimony and made excessive sua sponte objections. Rex fails to demonstrate prejudicial error. We affirm.
Comments on Rex v. Pelegrin CA2/3