In re J.M. CA4/1
K.M., the noncustodial father (Father) of J.M. and A.M., appeals from orders of the juvenile court finding it would be detrimental to place the children with him after removing them from the custody of their mother (Mother). He contends the orders must be reversed because the juvenile court failed to provide an adequate explanation for its finding that it would be detrimental to place the children in his care, as required by the applicable statute, Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.2 . We conclude the juvenile court did state some reasoning for its finding, substantial evidence supports further implied findings, and any failure by the court to adequately express its reasoning on the record was harmless. We therefore affirm the orders.
Comments on In re J.M. CA4/1