Morales v. Thee Aguila, Inc. CA4/3
Thee Aguila, Inc. (TAI) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court based on the jury’s verdict against TAI in favor of respondents, David M. Morales and his father, David Morales, Sr., on their contract claim against TAI. Respondents prevailed on their argument that the handwritten agreement drawn up by TAI’s principal, Henry Aguila, an attorney, required Aguila to pay respondents’ attorney for his legal services as part of a personal guarantee that respondents made to TAI to ensure TAI’s food truck commissary would pass all necessary inspections and obtain a business license.
Comments on Morales v. Thee Aguila, Inc. CA4/3