P. v. Moua CA5
Appellant Yeng Kong Moua was convicted of multiple sex offenses. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support one of his convictions for violating Penal Code section 220, subdivision (a)(1). Moua also contends the two 25- years-to-life sentences imposed pursuant to section 667.61 must be reversed because the accusatory pleading did not contain any section 667.61 allegations. We affirm the convictions, but remand for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Moua CA5