P. v. Grayson CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant William Grayson filed an opening brief that set forth the facts of the case and asked that this court review the record and determine whether there were any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant filed a supplemental brief, claiming (1) that his speedy trial rights were violated due to continuances of his trial requested by his counsel and granted over his objection, (2) counsel wrongly filed a motion to suppress evidence, and (3) insufficient evidence was offered at trial to prove his identity.
Comments on P. v. Grayson CA3