legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Perez CA3
Defendant David Casas Perez appeals from the trial court’s postjudgment order denying his request for recall of sentence after finding him ineligible for relief under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (Proposition 36). (Pen. Code, § 1170.126, added by Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 2012).) Defendant’s appeal is limited to the determination on one of his convictions for a violation of section 273d. He argues the trial court’s judicial fact finding as to his eligibility for this conviction “deprived him both of his right to a determination of those facts beyond a reasonable doubt and his right to a jury determination of those facts, secured by both the United States Constitution and the Reform Act [Proposition 36].”
We affirm the trial court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale