City of Riverside v. Golden Valley Collective CA4/
This case involves a nuisance abatement action brought by the City of Riverside (City) against Golden Valley Collective (the Collective). The Collective opposed the issuance of the preliminary injunction by relying on the recently enacted Proposition 64, the Adult Use of Marijuana Act. The trial court issued the preliminary injunction based on the Collective’s violation of the City’s zoning law prohibiting any property use that violates state or federal law, and the Collective’s lack of proper license required to operate a marijuana business under state law. The Collective appealed.
On appeal, the Collective argues that the City’s medical marijuana restrictions were preempted by and violate Proposition 64. We affirm.
Comments on City of Riverside v. Golden Valley Collective CA4/