P. v. Ford
A jury convicted defendant of four counts of robbery and found true the special allegation he had personally used a firearm in committing each of the offenses. On appeal defendant contends there is insufficient evidence to support the firearm enhancement as to one of the robberies and the jury relied on a legally inadequate theory in finding the firearm-use enhancement true as to that offense and two others. Court modified the judgment to correct the unauthorized sentence imposed by the trial court, but in all other respects affirmed the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Ford