In re S.A. CA4/2
D.D. is the paternal grandmother (PGM) of S.A., who was age four on the date of the challenged orders. PGM challenges: (1) the juvenile court’s decision at the disposition hearing on March 12, 2018, denying her request to be evaluated for preferential relative placement under Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.3 ; and (2) the court’s decision on April 9, 2018, to deny without a hearing her section 388 petition on the same subject. As discussed post, we affirm the court’s orders.
Comments on In re S.A. CA4/2