Tsang v. Engelberg CA1/3
Plaintiff Ellen Tsang appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict finding that she had not proven any of her causes of action against her neighbor, defendant Charles Engelberg, for trespass, nuisance, invasion of privacy, or intentional infliction of emotional distress, and from postjudgment orders denying her motions for a new trial and to tax Engelberg’s costs. Tsang’s primary arguments are that the trial court abused its discretion in granting her own motion in limine to bar evidence of other lawsuits in which she was a party, which assertedly prevented her from justifying her interactions with Engelberg by referring to another pending action between them, and that the verdict on each cause of action is against the evidence.
Comments on Tsang v. Engelberg CA1/3