legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mitchell CA2/7
Anthony Lamar Mitchell appeals from a victim restitution order entered following his conviction on a plea of no contest to attempted murder and other charges after Mitchell forced his ex-girlfriend into the backseat of her car and deliberately crashed it into several parked cars. Mitchell contends the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $17,598.10 in restitution to the owner of one of the damaged vehicles because the owner did not qualify as a “victim” under Penal Code section 1202.4. Because we do not read the restitution statute as narrowly as Mitchell does, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale