Rosen v. Lavitt CA2/2
Aaron Rosen (Rosen) appeals the dismissal of his third amended complaint (TAC) after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Alex Lavitt (Lavitt) and Gooseneck, LLC (Gooseneck) (collectively the Lavitt Parties). The main issues in this case revolve around Rosen’s claims to half the proceeds from the sale of a carwash as well as his claims that Lavitt interfered with two of Rosen’s real estate investment opportunities. In this appeal, Rosen has submitted inadequate briefs and we deem his arguments waived.
We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Rosen v. Lavitt CA2/2