Irving v. Greater New Bethel Baptist Church CA2/8
The trial court concluded all the allegations in plaintiff Raphael Irving’s lawsuit arose out of protected activity and did not have the minimal merit to withstand defendants’ anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) motion. Plaintiff appeals; but by failing to present meaningful arguments, he has forfeited them. We affirm.
Comments on Irving v. Greater New Bethel Baptist Church CA2/8