legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.A. CA4/2
S.G. (Mother) had unresolved mental health issues and a history of abusing drugs and neglecting her five-year-old son N.A. that led to the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) removing N.A. from her home. After over 18 months of reunification services, services for both Mother and Father were terminated and a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing was set. Mother filed a section 388 petition requesting additional reunification services and increased visits with N.A. The petition was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Mother appealed after her parental rights were terminated. On appeal, Mother contends the juvenile court erred in summarily denying her section 388 petition without a hearing because she met the requisite “probable cause” to trigger an evidentiary hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale