In re P.M. CA6
The juvenile court denied mother D.R.’s Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition to reinstate family reunification services and terminated her parental rights over her two-year-old daughter P.M. (minor). Mother argues on appeal that the juvenile court abused its discretion by refusing to reinstate family reunification services because mother’s progress in maintaining sobriety showed it was in minor’s best interest to give mother another chance to reunify. Mother also argues that the juvenile court erred by terminating her parental rights and freeing minor for adoption because the beneficial parent-child exception to the statutory preference for adoption applied. Finding no error, we will affirm.
Comments on In re P.M. CA6