legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bowen CA1/5
In 2016, a jury convicted James Frank Bowen of first degree murder, possession of firearm by a felon, and shooting at an occupied vehicle. The jury found true numerous enhancement allegations, including that during the murder, Bowen personally and intentionally discharged a firearm causing personal injury and death. The trial court sentenced Bowen to 107 years to life in prison, which included a mandatory enhancement under section 12022.53, subdivision (d).
On appeal, Bowen contends the court erred by failing to hold a hearing pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden). Bowen also argues—and the Attorney General agrees—his case must be remanded to allow the court to exercise its discretion under section 12022.53, subdivision (h), and to conduct proceedings pursuant to People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 (Franklin). We accept the Attorney General’s concession and order a limited remand. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale