In re Kayla G. CA2/4
Appellant Ariel G. [Father], father of Kayla and K.G., appeals the juvenile court’s July 2017 jurisdictional and dispositional orders. Father does not dispute the factual findings made by the court, including findings that he physically abused both his daughters and inappropriately touched Kayla, but contends that because the incidents occurred years in the past and he no longer has contact with the children, the sustained factual allegations did not support assertion of jurisdiction in 2017. He further contends the court erred in “removing” the children from his custody, as he did not have physical custody at the time of the jurisdictional hearing. We find jurisdiction supported by the factual findings, and that any error in removing the children from Father was harmless. Accordingly, we affirm
Comments on In re Kayla G. CA2/4