Younan v. CIT Bank CA4/1
Maher Younan (Maher) and his wife, Nadia Younan (Nadia) (collectively the Younans) brought this action against respondents CIT Bank, N.A (CIT) and Southland Home Mortgage, LLC (Southland), among other defendants. In the operative first amended complaint, the Younans claimed that CIT breached an oral agreement not to conduct a foreclosure sale of their home and that Southland wrongfully obtained title to the home at the unlawfully held foreclosure sale.
The trial court sustained Southland's demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend, and entered a judgment of dismissal in its favor. The trial court subsequently granted CIT's motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment in favor of CIT. On appeal, the Younans claim that the trial court erred in sustaining Southland's demurrer without leave to amend and in granting CIT's motion for summary judgment.
Comments on Younan v. CIT Bank CA4/1