P. v. Midence-Allen CA4/3
Ronny Gerardo Midence-Allen appeals from the judgment following his conviction on one count of possession of a controlled substance for sale. (Health & Saf. Code § 11378.)
He contends we must reverse the judgment because the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct when she argued to the jury she had satisfied her burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt by providing only “reasonable” evidence of his guilt. Further, Midence-Allen claims his own trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the improper argument and request a curative instruction.
Comments on P. v. Midence-Allen CA4/3