legal news


Register | Forgot Password

County of Sonoma v. Jensen CA1/1
Rosemary Jensen and the County of Sonoma (County) have been engaged in protracted litigation regarding certain property owned by Jensen. An abatement hearing found Jensen’s property in violation of the Sonoma County Code, and the resulting abatement order was upheld by the Northern District of California, the Ninth Circuit, the Sonoma County Superior Court, and this court.
In the most recent iteration of the parties’ dispute, the County filed suit to enforce the abatement order and have Jensen’s property declared a public nuisance. Jensen now appeals from a judgment that, in part, finds her in violation of the abatement order, directs her to cease the present unlawful uses and abate the zoning violations, and requires her to pay civil penalties, costs, and attorney fees. She contends the County’s claim to enforce the abatement order was required to be filed as a compulsory cross-complaint in her prior actions and is barred by the statute of limitations.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale