legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Adrian B. CA2/5
M.M. (Mother) appeals from the August 9, 2017 order terminating her parental rights. She argues the juvenile court did not have subject matter jurisdiction because it failed to comply with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”). She contends the juvenile court did not determine the home state, which was Missouri, and never conferred with Missouri as to whether it wished to exercise jurisdiction over the dependency case. Although the trial court failed to comply with the UCCJEA, we affirm because the court’s assumption of emergency jurisdiction was proper. We remand to the juvenile court to allow it to contact and provide notice to the Missouri court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale