Hollander v. XL Capital CA2/1
In 2007, Gail and Stanley Hollander (collectively, the Hollanders ) sued the insurer of certain artwork they owned, XL Specialty Insurance Company (XL Specialty), and various other defendants, including entities related to XL Specialty. Among those related entity defendants are the following: XL Capital Ltd. (XL Capital); XL America, Inc. (XL America); and NAC Re Corporation (NAC Re) (collectively, defendants).
In 2016, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants, finding that the Hollanders had not raised a triable issue of material fact with respect to either their alter ego/single enterprise or agency theories of liability. The Hollanders appealed, arguing that they had submitted sufficient admissible evidence to proceed to trial against defendants on those theories. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment.
Comments on Hollander v. XL Capital CA2/1