Buffalobyrd, LLC v. Ridder CA2/2
An LLC sued one of its members to reform its operating agreement due to an “inadvertent error” made by the attorney who drafted the agreement. The LLC and the member stipulated to a judgment reforming the agreement. Both before and after judgment was entered, however, the attorney moved to intervene, claiming that his reputation was being sullied and that the stipulated judgment reflected collusion. The trial court denied both motions. Because the judgment made no express or implicit findings regarding the attorney’s competence and for the additional reasons set forth below, the trial court’s rulings were correct, and we affirm.
Comments on Buffalobyrd, LLC v. Ridder CA2/2