P. v. Kelso CA1/3
Robert Grandville Kelso (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of attempted contact with a minor with intent to commit a sex crime (Pen. Code, § 288.3, subd. (a) ), attempted distribution of harmful matter to a minor (§ 288.2, subd. (b)), and arranging or attempting to arrange a sexual meeting with a minor (§ 288.4, subd. (b)). He contends the trial court abused its discretion and violated his right to due process by admitting into evidence text messages taken from his cell phone and a forensic report relating to images and videos taken from his computers. We reject the contention and affirm the judgment
Comments on P. v. Kelso CA1/3