legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Kelso CA1/3
Robert Grandville Kelso (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of attempted contact with a minor with intent to commit a sex crime (Pen. Code, § 288.3, subd. (a) ), attempted distribution of harmful matter to a minor (§ 288.2, subd. (b)), and arranging or attempting to arrange a sexual meeting with a minor (§ 288.4, subd. (b)). He contends the trial court abused its discretion and violated his right to due process by admitting into evidence text messages taken from his cell phone and a forensic report relating to images and videos taken from his computers. We reject the contention and affirm the judgment

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale