legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Moppin
Defendants were both convicted of two counts of grand theft. The trial court sentenced Moppin to state prison for a term of three years, eight months, and Smith to a term of two years. Both men appeal, with Moppin (joined by Smith) purportedly challenging the sufficiency of the evidence but in reality claiming instructional error, Smith (joined by Moppin) claiming directly that there was instructional error, and the Attorney General contending the trial court failed to impose a mandatory fee. Court modified the judgment to reflect the fee and, as modified, affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale